![]() The main trouble with phase shifts is where the same signal arrives at the listener via two signal paths, and there is a different phase shift in each. This roughly halves the potential phase delay between your signals while still achieving the desired results. The rest of the filters are designed solely for the individual output stage. The first high pass filter needs to be linear phase and is the one that protects your woofers from too much amplitude at the low end. Simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab ![]() This is a block diagram representation of that: In this way, if your original high-pass filter is linear phase, they'll all have the same group delay, and you'll only be adding on marginal delays from the various other filters. I would revamp the design if I were you if you were actually going to build and use this.īrian recommends a great idea if you use a linear phase filter, you'll just add in an overall delay to your signal rather than delaying some frequencies more or less than others.Ī good way of doing this would be to add the high-pass filter as a linear phase filter, and then using a low-pass from this signal for the bass as well as using the same signal for the medium and upper band-pass filters. That's a significant delay that would be very audible I think. Futhermore, if you have 180bpm music, that's 3 beats a second, and you'll end up with your delay being 1/15th of the time between beats. You have 20ms of delay (800/360*1/100=22ms) and that significantly higher than the thresholds talked about in the paper. You may look into the biquad filter topology:įilter design is all about tradeoffs between amplitude, roll-off, phase-shift, and complexity of design.įrom more research on experimental results and even though they don't go down to 100 hz here, I doubt you can handle the amount of delay you're adding in. If you want to remove the massive amount of phase shift, you'll want to find different topologies of filters that don't require you chaining 6 in series each additively increasing your total phase delay. If you were an audiophile trying to make a really nice sound system, then this wouldn't be the way to go, otherwise, this will likely work fine. It should only moderately distort your music. The distortion may be less noticable because it's at the low spectrum. This is going to cause relative distortion between different frequencies of the music you play because your higher frequencies will be going through a different filter will likely less phase shift. You've got it 800 degrees out of phase even at 100Hz where your amplitude is at 0 db. ![]() This is a picture of plotted group delay vs frequency. But I would like it to "sound" reasonably well, so will the phase shift cause distortions or anything like that?ĩHz to 500Hz area, their attenuation levels are ~30dB.ġ00Hz to 500Hz area zoomed into 0dB to -30dB attenuation level. ![]() Note that I am building this for learning purposes and the output doesnt have to be/wont be really clean or anything like that. I am wondering what is the importance of phase shift in such amplifiers? Can I just ignore it or should I compensate for it? How would I go about compensating the phase shift? The frequency response of the circuit looks good, but there is -100 to -1300° phase shift. Upper three op-amps are configured as high-pass and lower three as low pass active filters. I firstly feed that sigal through a band-pass filter with corner frequencies at about 20Hz and 200Hz. The audio source is a car radio with 1V p-p signal. I've just begun building a bass (20-200Hz) class D amplifier and already ran into some problems. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |